The IIT Quality Debate and a Few Questions for Mr Chetan Bhagat

Chetan BhagatChetan Bhagat said Infosys is a body shop, Narayana Murthy said IIT products are like Chetan Bhagat i.e. mediocre. Thus began a national debate, so fierce that it caused ache in our meritocratic selves. Mr Bhagat admits that he is hurt at his alma-matter being vilified by Mr Murthy and decided to stand up as a loyal alum, in defence of his beloved educational institution. It’s his sacred responsibility as an IITian to feel emotional outrage at such innuendoes.

Mr Bhagat has a point, we do often share an emotional bonding with our alma-maters, and IITs especially generate an implacable sense of accomplishment that inculcates us with excess self-esteem. The achievement of IIT graduates over the years has been stupendous, so much so that we may as well equate the progress of modern India with that of the IITians. They churn out the crème de la crème of software engineers unparalleled by any other institutions in the world. It is on their shoulders that the behemoth American companies such as Microsoft, Dell, Oracle, HP and Apple rest. In the San Francisco Bay Area, Bill Gates, Steve Balmer and Eric Schmidt still endorse events commemorating the IIT legacies. Vinod Gupta, Vinod Khosla and Purnendu Chatterjee are some of the notable shining examples of successful IITians. We very well know that in India, IITs are similar to some sort of academic pilgrimage for any grey-matter gifted teenagers. And such big aspirations call for big sacrifices. Any IITian would vouch for the fun they had to let go during their school years for their pursuit of the IITs.

Thus it is understandable that alums like Mr Bhagat would be angry at this unfounded criticism hurled at their beloved institution by the likes of Mr Murthy, a disgruntled IITian himself, a traitor of some sort. Mr Bhagat may be thinking it is a case of sour grapes syndrome for Mr Murthy, who had unsuccessfully compelled his own son to appear for IIT entrance exam several times. May be he still holds some anguish about that, which made him say what he said. Thus it is Mr Bhagat’s solemn responsibility not to let this public aspersion towards IITs by a jilted father of an IIT failure go without protest. Mr Bhagat himself knows that Infosys is no Apple Computers. Infosys does not have any branded product in the market to its credit; it has many well-known clients who take advantage of the wage gap between India and US contributing to its revenues. Infosys is indeed a software service company, so Mr Bhagat’s “body shop” analogy is not completely misplaced, though it may be a little harsh for us Indians to hear it, but hey! blunt truths are harsh too.

While Bhagat is quick to criticise Narayana Murthy’s comment, he does not do that in many other serious matters that besmirch the image of his IITs in much graver way.

But what strikes me as odd in this whole thing is the inconsistencies in Mr Bhagat’s reaction in matters related to his alma-mater. On one hand Mr Bhagat is all gung-ho in his defence of the IITs against Mr Murthy’s comment but he does not do that in many other serious matters that besmirch the image of his IITs in much graver way. I don’t remember Mr Bhagat condemning Rajat Gupta, an ex-IITian, for getting involved in inside trading in the US and going to jail for it. I don’t remember Mr Bhagat saying anything against the corruption that has afflicted IITs today. Why did he not protest when Prof A.K. Bhowmik was appointed the director of IIT-Patna after being indicted by CBI of malpractice and corruption during his tenure as professor in IIT Kharagpur? Where was Mr Bhagat when Dr Damodar Acharya, the current director of IIT Kharagpur, was indicted by CBI for selling IIT tenders to private corporations for personal gain, debauching the very IIT he heads? Why is Mr Bhagat not concerned at the low rate of peer-reviewed research publication in most IITs? Why Mr Bhagat is not concerned about the lack of entrepreneurial product generating research in IITs? Is this becoming of a largest state grant-funded institution to be so mediocre in research and so corrupt in its administration? And if Mr Bhagat is silent about these aspects why is he protesting when Mr Murthy is criticising the quality standards of IITs? Is it not hypocrisy?

Or is it a public relation game to get himself viewed? We know how much Mr Bhagat sells his IIT-IIM brand to shore up his book sales. This makes us suspicious of the authenticity of Mr Bhagat’s selective outrage, because had he truly been invested in the excellence of IITs, he should have protested at every instance of its defacement, which, unfortunately he does not do.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Dhrubodhi Mukherjee

About Dhrubodhi Mukherjee

Dhrubodhi Mukherjee is a social worker, educator and researcher. He works on international social development, comparative policy studies and social gerontology issues.
7 comments
deepa krishnan
deepa krishnan

probably trying to sell the next book with all the controversy.

arnie41178
arnie41178 moderator

@dhrubodhi Being an IIT ian myself from the CS department of IIT Kharagpur, I can say that not one of these passouts would ever consider being recruited by Reliance or let say any Indian Corporation. That's justified also, because typically Indian corporations cant provide them with the intellectually stimulating challenges and opportunities that they expect and also deserve. So if I talk about at least the high end streams in IIT, they do not qualify for your logic. They mostly go abroad for studies and settle there (again I am not complaining against that). My sole point is that the government should not bear the burden of providing them with subsidies. Even today most of the IITians come from affluent families. So why the question comes for providing theme with subsidy?

arnie41178
arnie41178 moderator

Dont you think subsidizing higher studies in IITs should also come with the clause that after pursing studies the person should work in the country only? If the guy is shipping out abroad and setting up his life there, why should the government sponsor it? I do not mind people going out of the country to study or work, in fact they should if they find better opportunities there. but they should not expect the government to fund them in that case. There should not be any free lunch after all

kaniska.mandal
kaniska.mandal

I think I have grossly generalized the requirement for 'subsidizing educational loan to pursue higher study'. So let me take few steps back.

Definitely the Government should have a policy in place to build a 'global talent pool' of meritorious students/engineers with legitimate degree in well-justified topics of interest!

Its difficult to say whether Govt. will financially loose or gain out of such investment.

Its also not possible to foresee if such global exposure will inspire the individuals to stay motivated and hungry or simply lure them to affluent luxurious life.

We need to remember USA has a very strong Visa requirement that arguably helps retain only the creamy layer of students. In fact eminent Immigrants from Google and others are fighting a case (that would mostly benefit Indian students) trying to influence USA Govt. to relax visa rules and promote the diversity and increase global participation in Silicon Valley RnD Centers.

But China without much concerns very smartly spreading the talent across all levels in USA.

Unfortunately, since India does not show keen interest in exposing its 'students/engineers/scientists to such illuminating international ambiance' ; the Service Provider companies take this opportunity to misuse the Visa Rules and export cheap labors. Chetan Bhagat makes a strong case here !

Ironically when an Indian with fake merit can sneak into USA with the help of 'Deshi' consultancies; I know of scientists who are not permitted to enter USA and keep struggling back home years after years owing to the lack of collaboration between diverse scientific minds !

Indian IT/Higher Education Ministry needs to set correct priorities ! Just focusing on building Service Business only help the Businessmen. The country sets a common goal for engineering --- 'appearing and clearing campus interviews of ISPs' and 'get absorbed like flocks of cattle' !!! Rather the country should open avenues to new horizons so that those who really capable of making a difference - can join the global stream of innovation !

Definitely, the privileged engineers need to contribute back to the Society.

That would complete the circle Govt-Engineers-Society !

There is living example like ever-inspiring Manilal Bhowmik -

Surviving famine, flood, extreme poverty, through the timely financial support from BC Roy, his raw talent flashed as laser beams that not only brought him the coolest awards but a palace on Beverley Hills. Apart from founding/sponsoring many world-class initiatives. His trust provides full financial support for university education of hundreds of meritorious but underprivileged students from rural Bengal.

dhrubodhi
dhrubodhi

@arnie41178 Well one of the major government revenue comes from foreign remittances sent by Indians abroad, that is an ever growing amount contributing to the economy, in an economically connected globalized world working for the country does not necessarily mean staying in the country, you can get hired by reliance and then they will send you to Kenya, so this kind of argument does not really hold water in the current economic set up.

kaniska.mandal
kaniska.mandal

By no means such misunderstanding between respected personalities can qualify as a subject for debate.

But I do support author's critical comments on the current problems with IIT. Constant monitoring and evaluation is necessary to maintain such a world-class standard.

I would like to highlight the current 'Images of IIT and ISP in USA' :

'Gross misuse of Skilled Worker Visa' by both Indian Service Provider (ISP) and US-based Indian Consultancy Companies have tarnished India's image as 'outsourcing destination'.

Legal proceedings are underway against such onsite and offshore majors.

Infosys lost some credibility, whereas TCS salvaged some by engaging more USA workers in its offices.

Overall, its a boon in disguise ! Let India become the 'RnD Hub' of the world !

The top-quality product companies Facebook, Twitter, Google, eBay, Cisco, Dell, Intel ..... just to name a few amongst thousands ....... not just thriving on IITians but they blindly rely on that brand name.

Right at this moment, IITians not just building one startup (innovative risk) after another, but playing a major role in driving the revenue of silicon valley in difficult times.

So why would majority of Indian Engineers waste precious time of his life maintaining the back office of global companies ? ISPs allure 'bright brains' with the 'Dreams of Dollars' , many ending up as 'modern slaves' to corporate america !

Whereas IITs compel one to chase the 'Dreams of Innovation' and govern the destiny of technology !

Government should relax the education policy to encourage more Engineers to pursue higher study in IITs !

Just like China, Govt should subsidize education loan so that more and more students can study abroad !

Lets stay 'hungry' and 'foolish' as urged by Steve Jobs, instead of getting bogged down in a blue-collar job !